this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
10 points (85.7% liked)

Asklemmy

42502 readers
1355 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

There's quite a few communities that i'm missing on Lemmy.
It could potentially lead to a trial, and/or "save" Lemmy, so it seemed worth asking, just in case.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (8 children)

There were instances doing exactly that. I don't know if they're still around because I blocked them as soon as they started showing up my feed. Most people absolutely hated them because it's basically just spam.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (4 children)

Do you remember their names ?
If people loved the content on reddit then they would continue to love it on Lemmy, it'd be the same posts, not anymore of a spam here than there, that's not a decisive counter-argument for me but thanks for the reply :)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (3 children)

It’s one thing for you to find content that you think is worth posting on lemmy and then duplicating the post here - even using a bot. This requires you to self evaluate whether the content is worthwhile before posting it. It’s another to simply repost all content from a sub without any human evaluation.

The biggest issue I see with bot posts is that they tend to spam the heck out of lemmy. At first I tried blocking bots that I found spammy, but ultimately I disabled seeing bot accounts because I got tired of constantly blocking them individually.

Keep in mind that yes, there is less content here, but that also means that if you make a bot that reposts all (or a lot) of content from active Reddit subs, you are going to inundate peoples feeds. It won’t be a problem for me, because I’ll never see it. But new and less tech savvy users might be annoyed/frustrated by the situation.

when I was seeing bot posts, it didn’t seem like they got any activity. It was a bunch of posts filling up my feed with no comments or activity — Just a bot shouting into the void.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

If you prefer that Lemmy stays small and eventually dies because of a lack of content then it's your problem, don't make it mine.
Only people subscribed to these communities will see these posts, except in the local feed if your instance hasn't defederated with lemmit.
If there's only one bot who mentions in his posts that you can block him, then your issue is solved as well as mine, and Lemmy will become as attractive as Reddit. Can't believe your opinion has so much support, it's like you'd prefer Lemmy to stay insignificant.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

No need to be hostile, nor put words in my mouth. I gave my view and reasoning without doing so. You should try to do the same. This isn’t Reddit, and I would prefer it to stay that way.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 10 months ago

And i would prefer if Lemmy was the number one social media in terms of usage, i hope that it's @dessalines goal if it's not yours, once again you would just have to block the bot if you don't desire to have more content. Thanks for the chat.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)