this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
834 points (96.3% liked)

World News

31475 readers
759 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It uncovered eight WHO panelists involved with assessing safe levels of aspartame consumption who are beverage industry consultants who currently or previously worked with the alleged Coke front group, International Life Sciences Institute (Ilsi).

Their involvement in developing intake guidelines represents “an obvious conflict of interest”, said Gary Ruskin, US Right-To-Know’s executive director. “Because of this conflict of interest, [the daily intake] conclusions about aspartame are not credible, and the public should not rely on them,” he added.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (8 children)

I'm sorry that people actually knowing biochemistry is such a problem for you.

Question: How can a dipeptide of two common amino acids, phenylalanine and aspartic acid, that dissociate in your stomach cause negative health impacts?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Just as easily as a molecule with two carbons, one nitrogen, one oxygen, and a hydrogen. Just because chemicals are simple doesn't mean they are safe.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

That's not really an answer. Any impact that aspartame would have, the same impact would occur from phenylalanine and aspartic acid consumption. And considering we both have no evidence for such impacts and both amino acids are critical for this whole being alive thing, that means there is no biochemical basis for claims of harm in the first place.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

I read some study that aspartame changed the gut flora. Sugar probably does the same thing though. But sometimes there's interactions that science forget to study

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)