this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
533 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

33602 readers
234 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 23 points 11 months ago (25 children)

hey everyone a friendly reminder that alternatives exist, and just drop this shit fast and move to better alternatives. In this case firefox.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago (2 children)

When websites start blocking clients that don't implement the wei handshake, you'll be forced to use one that does if you want to visit those sites. Firefox will either adopt it or become a second rate browser.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

For now, Mozilla's official stance is to oppose this proposal: https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/852#issuecomment-1648820747

I wish that this kind of thing would generate enough outrage to increase Firefox' market share considerably (from the <3% it is today), and in that way deter websites from adopting it since they would block a larger share of users. Unfortunately, I think that might be too naive of me...

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago

You require Chrome or a Chromium based browser to view this comment.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Websites should be able to block me. I can just go elsewhere.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago (2 children)

May be a bit problematic with banks, insurances and maybe government institutions...

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

it will truly be messed up if essential websites block user access because of this

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Most banking apps don't work on rooted Android phones. It's not the same, but I don't think it's a stretch to assume that at least these companies would force their customers to use specific software...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

And I use my root to hide my root from my banking app... Idk about the implementation details of this, but I kinda think the same could happen here as well.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

This is the problem for me. If my bank or other critical institution decides to refuse me access with Firefox, I can't use Firefox. This is the crux of the issue. Google is creating a browser monopoly with it's market dominance and attestation scheme.

MS tried to exert control in the early 2000's with its IE dominance and was thwarted by an anti-trust lawsuit. Google will probably skate on this one. Nowadays the consumer is only a resource to be plundered. The customer is shit.

load more comments (22 replies)