this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2023
228 points (91.0% liked)

Technology

33611 readers
326 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 183 points 10 months ago (28 children)

They had such a huge amount of brand recognition and vocabulary associated with their site and Elon just decided to kill that

[–] [email protected] 88 points 10 months ago (15 children)

No one will convince me he isn't doing this on purpose to tank the brand.

He and his buddies were mad that they couldn't compete. So he made the offer in a manic moment, and then was forced to go through with it. Now that he's got it, he's going to destroy it, and use the loss to reduce his taxes from all his government contracts.

And he simultaneously gets to platform fascists and silence people calling out the powerful. Wins all around.

For a normal person, this looks like failing. I totally get that. But rich people can derive massive benefits from stuff that would ruin us, and every single thing Musk is doing benefits him in some way.

[–] [email protected] 69 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago

This phrase doesn't really work if someone is trying to be malicious in the first place. I usually see it used when someone's intentions were good but they were just stupid about it. That's not really the case here

It's possible that Elon tried to do something malicious, and failed because of stupid choices. It's also true that the outcome also benefits him.

I will attribute it to malice regardless

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

That assumes all things are equal.

They rely on you repeating this adage to get away with this shit. It's too consistent. If he were actually stupid, he'd face negative consequences, which is something these folks very rarely have to do.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If you're rich enough you can just buy your way out of most consequences.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

America™; as much freedom (and justice!) as you can afford.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Land of the Free*

^*some^ ^conditions^ ^apply^

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago

That's you assuming all things are equal.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (24 replies)