this post was submitted on 14 May 2024
180 points (98.4% liked)

World News

31446 readers
753 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Still think jet fuel is the wrong thing to be looking at with carbon fuel emissions.

It is technically more feasible on a small scale because jet (and turbine) engines will burn basically anything, with jet fuel being a mixture of kerosene like hydrocarbons.

But iirc both land vehicle and shipping outclass airplanes in total emissions.

Cars & Trucks can be (for much cheaper) replaced by proper mass transit like high speed rail.

And I'm surprised cargo ships still run mostly on novelty sized diesel engines. Would be interesting to throw a small ultra safe nuclear powered engine on one of those or even just enforcing better fuel use instead of spamming low grade MDO.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Aviation is about a fortieth of the world's total emissions, so while there are certainly bigger sectors to look at it's still substantial enough that it'd be extremely helpful to fix it

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

What not fix all?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Research money may be a zero-sum deal. If so, do we want to waste time on essentially this decade's "vampire power"?

load more comments (3 replies)