35
submitted 3 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago

Fairly decent advice in my opinion

[-] [email protected] 17 points 3 weeks ago

Except for the statements that Apple is a better option for privacy. Its not.

Any OS or app that is not opensource code can't be trusted.

[-] [email protected] -1 points 3 weeks ago

We should have more "source available, but you still need to pay for it" licenses

Best of both worlds, the company still gets to sell a product, and we can inspect the source, or even submit PR's (and maybe get a little kickback (but that's pie in the sky))

Granted, it's super easy to remove the license restrictions with the source available

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

Best of both worlds

Only in term of security/privacy. Not control and freedom. And without freedom to modify, share and reuse software we are in a straight path to the lack of privacy again.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2024
35 points (83.0% liked)

Privacy

29763 readers
1225 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS