83
submitted 2 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

If you don’t enjoy it, don’t discount the franchise. Personally I prefer civ 4 over civ 6, and civ 4 has the bonuses of 1) being the only video game to ever win a Grammy award and 2) extensive voice work by Leonard Nimoy

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

what did you not like about 6?

[-] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Too clunky and slow paced for me compared to previous installments. Also not a huge fan of how the different victory conditions/requirements were balanced compared to older games. They just crammed too many new mechanics in there for the game to flow like it used to. If you’ve never played civ before these things may not even bother you since you have no previous experience with earlier installments to compare it to.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

thanks! ill try 4 if 6 seems annoying with those characteristics

load more comments (2 replies)
this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2024
83 points (96.6% liked)

Patient Gamers

10694 readers
156 users here now

A gaming community free from the hype and oversaturation of current releases, catering to gamers who wait at least 12 months after release to play a game. Whether it's price, waiting for bugs/issues to be patched, DLC to be released, don't meet the system requirements, or just haven't had the time to keep up with the latest releases.

^(placeholder)^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS