submitted 2 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

55 comments fedilink hide all child comments

How is it possible, that Signal still only provides a .deb package and no .rpm, or even better AppImage or Flatpak? There is an unofficial Flatpak but is it secure?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago

I mean it’s FOSS. Have you considered opening a PR to contribute what’s missing? You can be the change you want to see. I wouldn’t normally comment something like this. Your emphasis on “still” raised my hackles a little bit and led me to ask why you still haven’t made your own.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

Not everyone is a developer and they closed issues on github so why bother?

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

All of these packaging systems have plenty of tutorials. Speaking from experience, many maintainers were not developers when they started maintaining packages for distros other than the official distros. I have worked with several maintainers who do work in tech and know socially several who had no background. This could be a great place for you to start!

You bother because FOSS is as much paying it forward as it is getting shit for free.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

I will not bother because issues are closed and pull requests rejected left and right from signal for years.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

any idea why? Perhaps it's the same as the gnome-mentality, following a very strict philosophy?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

No idea

load more comments (1 replies)

this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2024

52 points (100.0% liked)

Free and Open Source Software

17476 readers

100 users here now

If it's free and open source and it's also software, it can be discussed here. Subcommunity of Technology.

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]