38
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2024
38 points (95.2% liked)
Asklemmy
42472 readers
1260 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- [email protected]: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
I've never seen HR use data brokers. I would think that could open them to a lot of risk, finding out things that aren't legal to know about someone before saying yes. All of mine have used actual background check agencies
If one isn't privy to those records, there's little risk?
Can you rephrase the question?
Who's going to know what HR had in their files, other than HR and whomever instituted a policy requiring things in HR files?