this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2023
76 points (77.5% liked)

World News

31456 readers
1479 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Some U.S. officials are frustrated at the pace of Ukraine’s counteroffensive, which has gained less than 100 square miles of territory.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (7 children)

Slow and steady wins the race.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (6 children)

Ukraine cannot win here. Russia has the world's most devious and cruel combat engineers laying in miles and miles of entrenched defence fortifications. Backed by Russia's world leading artillery battalions, there is no way Ukraine can push back Russia without battlefield nukes.

Russia is already laying in massive quantities of entrenched long range radar, antiaircraft batteries and missiles. US cannot acquire air power over that region any longer. If you have played a realistic war flightsim like Falcon 5.0, you will know air power cannot prevail against Russia's AA tech.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

The F-35 has been operating over Syria for years against those supposedly infallible Russian AA defenses. So far the only thing that's been able to hit them is a bird.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The f35 has stealth tech specifically designed to go against Russian AA, and the Syrians had antiquated systems.

The f16 does not, and the Russians have lots of the latest generation AA because they're the ones who make it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The F16 will be vulnerable but not completely useless, as implied by the other post.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Yes, I agree, it will be very briefly useful.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago

Tankies are gonna tankie.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)