this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2023
334 points (98.8% liked)

World News

31456 readers
996 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 42 points 11 months ago (6 children)

What's extra insane about the google one, Pichai's salary of 225m divided over the 10k workers fired is a staggering 22.5k/yr. If you assume the average tech salary of a remote google employee is somewhere in the 50k-100k range, that's 2.5k-5k / 10k workers that could have been saved by cutting Pichai instead.

Forget societal ethics, how do you justify to shareholders cutting ten thousand salaries worth of jobs and giving half the money to the CEO?

[–] [email protected] 34 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Because the shareholders get the other half

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

If I were a large shareholder, I'd demand a lot more than half goes to growth or my own dividends.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)