this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2023
665 points (97.2% liked)

Programmer Humor

31217 readers
44 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

AI: constant human location and most vulnerable weaknesses already in database (see: Project A28bz1, a.k.a. Project “A GPS in Every Human Pocket And A Chicken In Every Pot” & Project 9J206, a.k.a. Project “Cambridge Analytica”)

Request denied.

/correspondence

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Oh man.

Draw a human with human hands then!

[–] [email protected] -1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

More like:

"..."

Then 5 days later:

*weaponized robot dog and/or quadcopter noises*

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

The thing is AIs are actually really bad at physical stuff like replacing a rotor. Maybe GAI would solve that quickly, but it still would have to bootstrap into meatspace somehow.

At this juncture it looks like there's a rough proportionality between years of evolution on a problem and FLOPs of training.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That's impressive, and these guys are at the cutting edge, but notice it's on flat, predictable terrain. I bet it couldn't handle an uncharted bush. And, if the robots want to maintain themselves, much more than walking is required.

As for the FLOPs thing, their techniques are proprietary and bespoke, so it's entirely possible they've used a similar amount of resources to get to this point, even if we can't know.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I don't think the ground robots are quite ready to navigate sense bush, swamps, cross rivers, etc., no.

But the majority of the world's population is easily reachable by flat and predictable terrain right now. And if it really can't manage to get inside the habitat or attack it with anything else, you'll be starved out and die off before the robot does.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That's a good question actually, how long could this thing walk around a city before it gets caught on something or wedged in a corner or otherwise disabled?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Ask the same about a Tesla on autopilot

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago

The answer to that one is even known, and it's "a very long time, but not long enough to be safe". And all it has to do is follow a marked, probably charted road and not hit other cars.