this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2023
97 points (92.2% liked)

Technology

33602 readers
358 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In this video, a Canon print cartridge is opened up and revealed not to contain the meagre 11.9 ml (0.4 fl oz) of ink it is advertised. The proposed solution is to buy a printer designed to be manually refilled with bottles of ink (such as the featured Epson EcoTank ET-2850), though it has only been tested briefly.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 32 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

I feel like a Brother laser printer is a much better solution unless you specifically need color. Also, if you try and print with a laser printer after a couple months of disuse, it should fire right up and print. The same is not necessarily true of an ink jet, where things may have dried out and clogged.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago

I agree, $100 for a simple b&w laser printer $200ish for color from them are as much as pretty much anyone needs and they're stupid fast. Their software and toner management isn't customer hostile yet at least.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

I use a colour Brother laser printer. It works fine. Granted it's not great for photos but those are cheaper to have printed in a lab, which will give much better results that an inkjet anyway.