this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2023
111 points (95.9% liked)

Memes

44124 readers
1435 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (33 children)

No, it's mastodon but centralized. It takes all the difficulty out of signing up for the fediverse, like finding a server. I said it from day 1 on mastodon. We will never see mass adoption until there's a simple sign up process. People like centralized because it's easier.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (8 children)

I've been trying to hammer this point home.

I wish devs would wake up and create a default easy mode sign-up for the fediverse with an option to click "advanced sign-up" if you choose to do so.

The easy mode would just automatically assign an instance based upon some algorithm.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, like asking users what their preferences are and select the servers based on the criteria users have chosen?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hmm actually yeah this is a good idea, but the problem is that there's so many servers that I feel that after choosing criteria there'd still be a bunch of servers in the list and the problem remains, right? Just bouncing ideas. I quite like this idea though.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Then the algo recommends the one with the lowest load and hides the others behind a ... icon or something.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Mm this could be a problem because server load is too unpredictable. I would actually say just randomize the list, so that it kinda does its own "load balancing" by incentivizing to pick whatever random top one it selected?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah, whatever metric. Could also use a mix of number of users, some form of reputation measurement, uptime, etc.

I mostly meant that the system should pick a "best server" and recommend that. Smarter people than me can come up with the best metric.

But swamping the user with >100 servers to pick from is counterproductive.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (30 replies)