this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
834 points (96.3% liked)

World News

31452 readers
1172 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It uncovered eight WHO panelists involved with assessing safe levels of aspartame consumption who are beverage industry consultants who currently or previously worked with the alleged Coke front group, International Life Sciences Institute (Ilsi).

Their involvement in developing intake guidelines represents “an obvious conflict of interest”, said Gary Ruskin, US Right-To-Know’s executive director. “Because of this conflict of interest, [the daily intake] conclusions about aspartame are not credible, and the public should not rely on them,” he added.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 28 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I believe there are studies showing it messes with gut bacteria. Seems consistent with what you describe.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

yeah the occasional non-cancer side effects are well known by now but weirdly enough they just can't seem to find anything conclusive on whether it causes cancer or not...

At this point I'm willing to accuse the sugar lobby for trying to sabotage this chemical out of the market

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

Or the corn lobby, can make HFC without corn subsides.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Not aspartame. The study, it’s mainly one, showed that sucralose and saccharin did just that. But aspartame had no effect.