this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
834 points (96.3% liked)

World News

31456 readers
996 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It uncovered eight WHO panelists involved with assessing safe levels of aspartame consumption who are beverage industry consultants who currently or previously worked with the alleged Coke front group, International Life Sciences Institute (Ilsi).

Their involvement in developing intake guidelines represents “an obvious conflict of interest”, said Gary Ruskin, US Right-To-Know’s executive director. “Because of this conflict of interest, [the daily intake] conclusions about aspartame are not credible, and the public should not rely on them,” he added.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 187 points 10 months ago (30 children)

We've studied this chemical literally more than any other food additive and there's still nothing definitive. Also mice are not a good stand-in for humans. They are really only used for acute toxicity and such.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 10 months ago (9 children)

I honestly have no clue on the studies but I can't drink anything with aspartame in it at all, even a single sip bloats me and screws up my bowel movements hard. It might just be an allergy but it took me 3 years to find the cause and I'm happy to avoid it that's for sure.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I believe there are studies showing it messes with gut bacteria. Seems consistent with what you describe.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Not aspartame. The study, it’s mainly one, showed that sucralose and saccharin did just that. But aspartame had no effect.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (27 replies)