World News

31456 readers

1408 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

834

Revealed: WHO aspartame safety panel linked to alleged Coca-Cola front group (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

214 comments fedilink hide all child comments

It uncovered eight WHO panelists involved with assessing safe levels of aspartame consumption who are beverage industry consultants who currently or previously worked with the alleged Coke front group, International Life Sciences Institute (Ilsi).

Their involvement in developing intake guidelines represents “an obvious conflict of interest”, said Gary Ruskin, US Right-To-Know’s executive director. “Because of this conflict of interest, [the daily intake] conclusions about aspartame are not credible, and the public should not rely on them,” he added.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago (11 children)

I still wonder if artificial sweeteners mess with metabolism, say by training people to ignore satiety signals, which would be why we saw that study a few days back saying artificial sweeteners are associated with weight gain.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (9 children)

One theory is that the body doesn't know if the sweetness is sugar or sweetener. So it produces insulin to take care of it. When the level of insulin gets too high the body tries to compensate by eating more. If that "more" is more sweetener...

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Never experienced hypoglycemia while on keto and using sweeteners lol

[–] [email protected] -4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

You heard it here guys, this dude is pretty sure it never happened to him, so it's definitely fine.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

Nobody claims it's fine, it's just a personal example

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's just as valid, if not maybe a little more, than the guy claiming it is the reason. People are allowed to discuss their personal opinions and they should need to include that it's only a sample size of one and not independently verified. No one should be stupid enough to think they're claiming otherwise and need to say it out loud that they don't trust it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Anecdotes are not "personal opinions" and they certainly aren't valid or valuable in the context of evaluating scientific claims.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

No, it isn't valuable for scientific evaluation. They are valid though. Anyway, the other comment was just a claim without any supporting evidence for it but no one felt they needed to point that out.

load more comments (7 replies)

load more comments (8 replies)