this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2023
42 points (93.8% liked)

Technology

33632 readers
221 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Google has R&D ADHD. They get halfway to refining good ideas and then drop them for the new shiny. From the interviews with engineers in the article it seems like it comes from senior management.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It definitely comes from up the chain.

Google promotes people who ship successful projects. So your managers are all people who have previously shipped something that was well received.

So they are very sure of their ability to ship the next thing and their ability to choose what's important. Amplify that each step further up you go.

My skip level was overall fairly levelheaded but had a wildly out of sync estimation on team inertia. (she got let go shortly after the layoffs from what I've heard). The further up the chain you got and it was clear that she was constantly getting pressure to ship.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This makes sense but I'm surprised about the pressure to ship, we saw pressure to deliver but also idiots kept having "brilliant ideas" about the requirements so whatever you were doing was obsolete before it was halfway to completion.

Google was just like God spilled a person.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yeah we were pretty focused on a specific app rework that had full buy-in and a lot of focus.

Then January happened and afaik all progress has basically stopped according to my old team.

Not my problem anymore. Got that sweet severance package and a new job that pays better.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Wow, I left shortly after but I was still fresh.

Went to a startup with a xoogler boss who was brilliant but without all the stupid bits of Google, he's awesome and we're rocking.

The pay cut was worth the massive decrease in BS, I enjoy my job and being productive.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

It's not senior, or at least not just senior, it's the process.

You're doing it for your promotion packet, once you've got that in place you leave and your project falls apart because there is absolutely 0 interest or understanding for Sustaining engineering or really anything except "I Made this".

The smart people hop around while the slow ones try to milk out some promotions to keep going.

It's a catastrophe, and with the current downturn the politics is turning nasty.