this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2023
455 points (98.1% liked)

Linux

45501 readers
1617 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

What use to be the PPA that allowed Ubuntu users to use native .deb packages for Firefox has recently changed to the same meta package that forces installation of Snap and the Firefox snap package.

I am having to remove the meta package, then re-uninstall the snap firefox, then re-uninstall Snap, then install pin the latest build I could get (firefox_116.0.3+build2-0ubuntu0.22.04.1~mt1_arm64.deb) to keep the native firefox build.

I'm so done with Ubuntu.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (15 children)

@Linuturk @PseudoSpock My problem here is that I don't understand the purpose of flatpak when Deb seems to have everything from my experience, but I'd love to be proven wrong.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 10 months ago (11 children)
  1. Flatpaks are usually fresher than point release distro packages
  2. Flatpaks are distro-agnostic
  3. Flatpaks are easily containerized for increased security and privacy
  4. Flatpaks can guarantee you have a known-good dependency chain directly tested by the developers/maintainers themselves
  5. Flatpaks can be installed and managed entirely in userspace
[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (5 children)

All of that is good but you are overlooking the small detail that installing flatpack implies using up a lot more disk space than just pulling a distro package.

I can point one specific example with libre office: 3.9GB for the pack vs 785MB for the .deb.

We can argue disk space nowadays is cheap but overloading a machine with duplicated packages also goes against the main goal of running a Linux.

When I first started using it, one of the talking points was that Linux kept the system clean of clutter and that improved longevity for the hardware and delivered stability by not having unnecessary and unused or orphaned and redundant libraries and dependencies.

With flatpacks we get the latest and greatest - I'm a debian fan and I hurt for not getting more up to date software - but we are carting in a ton of junk that should not be necessary.

And the container/sandbox part is not that great, apparently. Debian wiki links to this to further educate/alert on the down sides of flatpacks. Debian is not the ultimate bearer of truth but they do move a lot of respect.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

The 3.9GB is not just libreoffice, that number also includes runtimes. At most you would only install maybe around half of your host systems’s packages in runtimes for all the apps you use. There shouldn’t be any more usage than that. And even less if you stick to apps that fit your DE. Like if I just stuck to apps that used the gnome runtimes, I would have a pretty minimal installation.

Unfortunately, the dependency problem is really hard to solve, and at least they deduplicate what they can. Everything else works perfectly as well besides some minor issues with the sandbox connecting to the host system in certain edge cases.

Also please don’t link flatkill, it’s woefully outdated and every point on there has been addressed for years; it should be taken down.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)