this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2023
67 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37362 readers
303 users here now

Rumors, happenings, and innovations in the technology sphere. If it's technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Court upheld many restrictions on the White House and Surgeon General’s office’s contacts with tech companies, finding that they ‘coerced’ platforms’ content decisions

WP gift article expires in 14 days.

https://ghostarchive.org/archive/E0sEO

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 35 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The judges wrote that the FBI’s activities were “not limited to purely foreign threats," citing instances where the law enforcement agency “targeted” posts that originated inside the United States, including some that stated incorrect poll hours or mail-in voting procedures.

What does foreign threats have to do with this. The FBI deals with domestic terrorists. Does this not fall within the FBI's jurisdiction as well?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

A foreign actor's speach isn't constitutionally protected; that's the relevance.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Free speech does not include subversion of the constitutional right to vote or seditious speech. The judges are clearly partisans. I'll wager they are Republican appointees.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Wow its good this article isn't talking about speech like that

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Lying about voting locations and dates aren't subverting the constitution? Really? So we only have the constitutional right to vote if we can figure out the real times and locations on our own, and giving false information that causes people to be unable to Vote is all just lulz?