this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2023
63 points (98.5% liked)
Privacy
29831 readers
1024 users here now
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don't promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
Chat rooms
-
[Matrix/Element]Dead
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The problem is that It looks abandoned. Not a new release in a year
If it's feature complete, a keyboard doesn't need regular updates. According to the other thread it's not feature complete, so it could be abandoned. Since it's FOSS any enthusiastic person could stop it from being abandoned.
It's "early beta". It has been for 15 months. This doesn't qualify as a software that "doesn't need updates".
Edit: there have been commits, just no releases or tags...
I agree in this case.
But there's a narrative that software needs regular updates or it's worthless, but some things are just done and stable.
Oh, yes. Absolutely. The "this software is newer therefore better" or "it gets more updates so I know it's better software" affirmations make about as much sense as "my complete rewrite of Shakespeare's work using a vocabulary of 200 words is better because it is newer" or "this mathematical proof uses more paper, so I know it's better".
This "argumentum ad novitatem" fallacy grinds my gear almost as much as the "argumentum ad populum" one...
Unfortunately, both argumentations are really common in FOSS (and in software in general). 😑