this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2023
308 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37355 readers
260 users here now

Rumors, happenings, and innovations in the technology sphere. If it's technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 47 points 9 months ago (68 children)

Makes sense. Heat pumps are one of the few heating systems that can achieve greater than 100% efficiency. (energy in vs total heat output)

As long as you can keep the evaporator above the evaporation temperature of your compressed refrigerant, you're golden. Burried lines are excellent for that in colder climates, but the space for it isn't always easy to find.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago (25 children)

I mean, in the colder climates that have natural gas piped to homes anyway.

Why not use a pilot light worth of gas to keep the evap side a tad bit warmer on the days that it drops real cold.

Sure, your still using some gas, but you'll be extreme sipping at it.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago (4 children)

I haven't seen this argument listed yet, but my reason for wanting to go off natural gas is how much we lose in transmission. I don't feel like finding sources right at this moment but most estimates I've seen are ~2%, and methane is a pretty potent greenhouse gas.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

That's a fair argument. Even if every used a tiny bit, there would still be a lot of loss to the atmosphere through leaks/etc of the distribution system.

So yes 100% elimination would be ideal.

But this could be a viable middle step between 100% gas heating -> Supplemental/Heat Pump -> 100% Heat Pump

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)
load more comments (65 replies)