this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2023
352 points (98.4% liked)
RPGMemes
9744 readers
857 users here now
Humor, jokes, memes about TTRPGs
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
No, in an exception based system like D&D, specific trumps general. There is a general rule in the DMG that states that you can’t bring someone back to life against their will; and since Revivify doesn’t specifically state that it is an exception to this rule, it isn’t.
Sure you can. Reincarnate specifies a willing soul, Revivify doesnt. Meaning you could revivify against their will. A costy tool but useful one for a torturer.
Dungeon Master's Guide p.24, Bringing Back the Dead:
That's the general rule for anything that brings the dead back to life. The spell needs to explicitly override this for it to work differently.
Reincarnate doesn't specify that the subject knows what form they're coming back to, or that "reincarnate" is being used at all. So the subject doesn't know that.
So tell me. Why specify it in Reincarnate and not in Revivify then ?
I also checked True resurection and it also specifies that the souls needs to be willing.
The answer is this : WotC fucked up.
But I agree, the DMG does says this. Buuuuut. Since some spells mentions willing souls and Revivify dont, I would say that this spell is so fast that the soul cannot decide since its probably still hanging around and so you could use it AT MY TABLE as a way to bring back a soul, willing or not.
But RAW you are correct. Still gonna use it my way as long as everyone agrees at the table. Its not like its gonna break the game.