50
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

The person I am talking about is Dr. Palaniappan Manickam aka Dr. Pal, a board-certified gastroenterologist from Sacramento, California, who is also a YouTuber. He's created various videos targeting Indian netizens, most of which are decent, but not without adding his own twist of misinformation, that are considered unscientific - some of them have been debunked here and here (auto-captions available).

I can't help but think why YouTube would immediately remove videos that spread misinformation, but only when it affects the western world, but not the other part? Clearly, this guy's video is in English, he participates in collaborations with other misinformation-peddling YouTubers - the consequences of which a few percent of the billion people in India have to face - which is still, a lot of people? Sure, you can complain that it is the responsibility of the Indian government - but they are themselves in this business of pseudo-science. When there's no one taking responsibility, I can't help but feel helpless about the lies people will hear.

Edit: And to why this matters, there's an on-going case in the Supreme Court of India. Said "guru" sold Coronil kit, and mocked dying doctors. What did the kit do? It had high concentration of lead. Dr. Cyriac Abby Philips fought against it - and the system tried to punish him.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Its exactly this. We covered in nursing school how to read a research paper and what things to look for to find limitations and biases that were either intentionally hidden or overlooked, or just to be able to properly contextualize what we're reading.

A good example from my specific specialty is antipsychotic drug trials. One of the examples they showed in class was a study that "proved" that Risperdal had a more benign side effect profile than Haldol... by giving normal doses of risperdal and insane doses of haldol. So of course the Haldol had more side effects, they were giving way more of it than most patients would ever be taking. Iirc they said something like 20mg 2x daily, and I can count on one hand the number of patients I've had on that high of a dose and every single one of them had injured multiple staff members.

Meanwhile the Risperdal group was on like 8mg, which for Risperdal is on the higher end, but not wtf range like 20 of Haldol (it is important to note that dosages can vary wildly between different medications even within the same class; I take seroquel which is in the same class AND generation as Risperdal, but I take 50mg and that's a tiny dose for seroquel, because I'm taking it to sleep for shift work, a true antipsychotic dose would be 400-800mg. The lack of direct equivalency between many medications even within the same class makes this particular type of misdirection easy).

So yeah, the line between "hacks selling poison" and "scientists in search of the truth" is not as cut and dry as it should be and can require a fair amount of both critical thinking and specialized knowledge to sus out. Wether or not you think the average person should have those knowledge and skills, the fact of the matter is that they don't. That's why it's important to have well-vetted academics doing the research and reviewing each other's work, and giving them a platform to gain the public's trust then educate them. The problem is a lot of people in power right now really do not want the public educated about anything, because that would make them harder to control and abuse.

this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2024
50 points (93.1% liked)

Asklemmy

42472 readers
1246 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS