this post was submitted on 01 May 2024
708 points (97.7% liked)

RPGMemes

9744 readers
857 users here now

Humor, jokes, memes about TTRPGs

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Am I missing something? If you ask brother A, he would say his brother likes small butts. If you ask brother B, he would also say his brother likes small butts. How do you differentiate?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It works the same as the original puzzle. If you ask the lying small butt brother, he'll lie and say his brother would say he likes small butts. If you ask the truthful big butt brother, he'd say his brother would say he likes big butts, because he knows his brother likes small butts and would lie about it.

Essentially the negatives work out so that each brother answers with the kind of butt they themselves like, which you can then use to determine which is truthful (though at this point that somehow seems less important).

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I feel like the truthful brother would say his brother likes small butts, because that's the truth.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Yes, but you're not asking him what his brother likes, you're asking him what he would say he likes, which is what flips it. You're basically making sure the answer is a lie regardless of which brother you ask.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The truth is that the whole setup is moot if it's one of the door-guards that tells you the rules, since they might be lying about the whole thing. There needs to be a trusted third-party involved, who knows about the guards but doesn't know which one's lying and which one's telling the truth.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

True. It seems there are different versions of the puzzle, but from a quick search it was popularized by the movie Labyrinth, and there they get around it by having a second set of guards who don't know the answer explain the setup.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

I really like this idea, and now I want to put it in a session. Like, we go through the whole 2-brothers riddle, but it turns out that the one explaining the rules is the one lying.

Maybe both doors lead to "death"/encounters, maybe the players are free to just walk past the brothers without consequence, maybe a third more interesting thing happens.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Got it! That makes sense. Thanks for explaining.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago