this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2023
258 points (92.2% liked)

World News

31483 readers
789 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -2 points 11 months ago (20 children)

Was it? According to who? The people who have been selling artillery shells to drop on the people of Luhansk for over nine years? Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

Michael Radachovsky, political advisor to the European Commission, noted that there were no violations in terms of voting procedures at the polling stations he visited.

“The elections were well organized in terms of how people were treated, the process itself was very well organized,” he stated.

https://mronline.org/2022/12/02/the-narrative-of-sham-elections/

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (19 children)

"Well organized" doesnt mean legitimate. The referendum was organized without the consent of the legitimate government of Ukraine, was rightfully boycotted by Ukrainians, was scoped beyond the occupied areas and included non residents shipped in from russia.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

And let's not forget the polling. Over 94% voter turnout (or an illicit vote) and 98% voting for annexation? You can't even get 80% of people to vote for "don't shoot yourself in the face" and we're supposed to believe the annexation vote was near-unanimous?

The propagandists really should've made up a number closer to 60% with 85% turnout, enough that a majority of the population could be said to have voted for annexation, while still being believable.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago
load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)