this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2024
46 points (89.7% liked)
Open Source
28963 readers
249 users here now
All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!
Useful Links
- Open Source Initiative
- Free Software Foundation
- Electronic Frontier Foundation
- Software Freedom Conservancy
- It's FOSS
- Android FOSS Apps Megathread
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
OSM data is generally on par or better than Google Maps data. The thing that’s lacking is the search engine.
Except for a lot of POI missing.
You can add them (Beginners' Guide)
Situations in which I quickly need a reliable source of POI are not compatible with me taking the time to search for them in person and then add them to the maps systen I am trying to use right now.
So usually when I need something quick right now, I can not trust OSM.
When I am on a relaxed walk in the neighbourhood, I do add stuff and that makes it a bit better for everybody. But then, I obviously don't ever need to search for those.
I understand what you mean and I agree that in those cases GMaps is more useful. But then, if no one adds anything OSM database will always be empty. So, if you don't find something, use GMaps, that's fine. But then, what you were looking for should be added to OSM (after real-life checks, since GMaps cannot be used as a source) to help future users.
Dammn, you mean there is no "Church of big mommy milkers" in the next city?
Don’t worry, googles AI and monetization will fix their better search eventually.
Doesn’t most map providers get their data from OSM?