this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

World News

31456 readers
996 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The scientists used lasers to fuse two light atoms into a single one, releasing 3.15MJ (megajoules) of energy from 2.05MJ of input – roughly enough to boil a kettle.

Why do we even study this? Renewables are the only way. This is a waste of money which is a finite resource.

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

So 1. This is newable. Green, almost waste free, and unlimited.

If we can refine fusion, we will stop global warming and energy insecurity, virtually overnight.

It's not a waste to invest in clean tech R&D. At one point, people said the same thing about solar, and look where we are now

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Do you really think PV cells and nuclear fusion are in any way comparable? What a strange take.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Fusion is constant, wouldn’t require large amounts of batteries to store energy. There are advantages to each.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It’s not though, not withstanding stars. We’ve managed 17 minutes so far. We’re so far away from turning this into a useable power source that it’s absurd.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

So? The trick is to keep developing the technology, not give up because it doesn't immediately deliver unlimited energy.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

We've been working on fusion in one form or another for nearly 100 years. We're still nowhere near turning it into a useable energy source. I don't really care if research continues or not, I'm sure the research can be useful in other areas but fusion is not going to save us.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

In the way the other poster compared them? Yes, in so far as people who complain “the new, developing technology isn’t immediately as optimised and refined as I want it to be” for both.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Do you have a basic understanding of the challenges of getting electricity from a fusion reaction vs the challenges of manufacturing PV panels?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

So we should just give up? No.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

We can carry on throwing money at it, I'm fine with that. Thinking that fusion is going to save us is dangerous though. We need to be taking action now to get us off fossil fuels and the most cost-effective way to do that is renewables + storage.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Seeing as you deliberately seem to be missing the point in order to try and feel smarter I’m going to leave you to it. Have a good one.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

I asked a question, a relevant one. Your reaction to that question is your problem.