this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2023
3 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

29831 readers
1054 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Apple has said planned changes to British surveillance laws could affect iPhone users’ privacy by forcing it to withdraw security features, which could ultimately lead to the closure of services such as FaceTime and iMessage in the UK.

top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (5 children)

Everyone commeting here saying “good, we will switch to X” is absolutely stupid. This law means no iMessage, no Signal, no WhatsApp, no Telegram, no secure encrypted messaging for anyone.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

People completely missing the point for an opportunity to shit on Apple is on brand though. Lol.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Oh I think there is hundreds reasons to shit on Apple, but this ain’t one of them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Good luck enforcing that.

Anyway the criminals are just going to switch to something else so this law is useless

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Either that or an app that has been vetted by government stooges and given the thumbs up as its trivial for others to access the content on.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Great! If you’re technical and not have iOS. That’s already 50% of British market not using it.

Besides, it won’t help you if that’s a government mandate, and Google will be forced to take it down for the UK market from the store. Not a lot of people are installing apps from outside the Play Store.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Too bad if people arent willing to adapt. I guess you'll just have to use paper notes and face to face contact, or whatever app your government makes. /S

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Bullshit. Open source distributed messaging clients will always exist. The key is to federate and host in other countries.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Okay, try explaining it to my 51 years old father. Or someone who really isn’t into tech in general.

Federated stuff will work for you and I - technically knowledgeable people. But we are a tiny fraction of population. The success of WhatsApp lays in its super simplicity.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Click this link, type email and password. Federated services are just as easy from UX side. The complexity is the backend.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

It seems easy, but the moment you ask the user to “choose their instance” - you already push away a lot of untechnical people. What is an instance? How do I know which one is good? Will I be able to talk to people on other instances (look at Lemmy, some instances are blocked by other instances)? Why do I even have to choose an instance?

From an UX standpoint, that’s a disaster. Stuff like Lemmy or Mastodon will remain forever a niche, because of that.

EDIT: Typo

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Yeah, don't tell your grandpa to pick an instance. Just link him straight to the registration page. Solved.

Lemmy is the same. Facebook is the same. You don't need to tell a user that their Facebook account is going to be shared by their geography. That doesn't matter.

Just link then to the registration page for the instance that you use. Easy.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (2 children)

The UK cannot believe every tech company will allow the govt to pre-approve updates instead of just pulling out.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I think you underestimate the deep stupidity and tech-ignorance of our politicians, coupled with their burning desire to know everything that we do. This is a set of people who think hidden == illegal.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

This is a set of people who think hidden == illegal.

This is a fundamental shift in mentality that has occurred over the last 30 years and it's startling how many average people have bought in. There doesn't need to be a reason for something to be legal, rather there needs to be a compelling reason for it not to be. People have stopped viewing freedom as fundamental right, but rather as something granted to them by the government on a case by case basis.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Unfortunately both big parties tend towards authoritarianism too. The 'nanny state' is popular with voters.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

No normal person would think every tech company would, but our politicians are bloody idiots if we go by their history

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Why do they not see that encryption can happen in any form of communication even if they do get their backdoors? Are they going to make all encryption illegal?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

I'm pretty sure that's the end-game, yes. At least as far as communication based tools go, which would include chat apps, VPN's, cloud storage etc etc. The ruling classes in the UK are very nanny-state and genuinely believe that a persons right to privacy comes a distant second to being able to rule over us and control us more effectively.

The issue for non-UK countries is that when world governments see that its possible to pass these sort of laws, they'll be keen to do the same. And most people are not tech-savvy, they'll have no real idea why it's important or invasive. It's difficult enough to get people to switch to Signal. Imagine trying to explain why breaking encryption is a bad thing for them.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Good. Let's all move to signal

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Signal have already said they will withdraw completely from the UK, as have WhatsApp, Session and a few others.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

If and when Signal is packaged for F-Droid, how is the British government going to stop people in the UK from using Signal?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Knowing this gvmt, they'll try and prevent access at the ISP level. They've already started making noises about tackling 'the menace of VPN's'.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Apple's arrogance leads it to threaten to remove something that's neither unique nor actually cross-platform anyway.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Did you even read the article? They are refusing to allow the British government to control the encryption standards used by the entire world. They are also not the only company to make this decision. Any company using E2EE will be affected.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

No one reads the articles. They just want to be outraged, not informed.

load more comments
view more: next ›