this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2023
65 points (97.1% liked)

Asklemmy

42520 readers
873 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

So, I heard several people now mention HAARP as the cause for all the natural disasters that have been happening lately. And here I thought the cause was rampant pollution and global warming!

But seriously, I'm looking at the HAARP page on wikipedia and it seems to be an array for studying the ionosphere? How in the hell do you go from "we're using this to see what's happening way up there in the sky" to "this causes tornadoes"? Who even started this garbage?

top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 45 points 11 months ago (2 children)

HAARP is an old school conspiracy theory. I haven't heard someone bring this one up in years. It's your classic government control the weather theory.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 11 months ago

Old enough to have an X-Files episode. Remember when wacky conspiracies where good old fun?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I had no idea this was old school. I thought this was a recent thing. Though, the book in @[email protected]'s comment was published in 1995, so I guess I just hadn't noticed until now.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

As far as I know, the "logic" is as follows:

  1. The ionosphere is very important for the weather
  2. HAARP is doing something with it
  3. Obviously not just studies, these antenna arrays use lasers or radiation to influence it directly.
  4. Pew pew
  5. Tornados
[–] [email protected] 26 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Nowadays blaming HAARP means they aren't blaming Exxon. In the past I believe it was just conspiracy fodder.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)
  1. people die
  2. society collapses
  3. ???
  4. profit

That’s the basic pattern for most conspiracies anyway. I’m still wondering how the conspiracy theorists expect billionaires will make even more money by cutting the human population to a tiny fraction of its current number. Well, I guess I’m just not smart enough to see the hidden truth or whatever.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

Right? Billionaires have an obvious interest in the status quo - that's why getting anything to ever change in ways that mildly inconvenience them is like pulling teeth.

Like others have pointed out in the thread, though: if you're expecting rationality from conspiracy theorists, you've already lost.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Long story short, the HAARP nonsense has its origins in psychology. If you want the long version, check this article. It also answers how conspiratorial thinking in general works, not just the nut jobs spreading wild stories about HAARP.

Because these delusions are based on defects of the mind, there’s no amount of facts that you can throw at this problem and expect it to be fixed that way. What wasn’t reasoned in, can’t be reasoned out of a broken mind like that. These people are in need therapy and support more than anything else.

If podcasts, are more your thing, consider listening to You’re not so smart - episode 197 conspiratorial thinking. I think the part about the history of small and large conspiracies was particularly fascinating. Grand conspiracies are impossibly difficult to pull off, because there’s always a weak link somewhere which will make the whole thing collapse sooner or later. On the other hand, small conspiracies are a reality, and there have been numerous documented cases of those happening in real life.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Because these delusions are based on defects of the mind, there’s no amount of facts that you can throw at this problem and expect it to be fixed that way. What wasn’t reasoned in, can’t be reasoned out of a broken mind like that.

This hurts to read, but I have to agree. Especially because the person who first told me about HAARP has a freaking degree in psychology.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Well, I know someone with a PhD in chemistry, and he still believes the covid vaccine is designed to kill people, cause a global collapse and all that. The human mind just is never truly safe from this type of thinking.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

A PhD doesn't mean anything other than that you are a fast learner and are dedicated enough to work on a project for years. It doesn't mean you are intelligent or even that you know everything in your field, however it does usually result in you being an expert in a very specific small corner of your field.

I have a PhD

[–] [email protected] -4 points 11 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

This is a very interesting case study in how confirmation bias can affect conspiratorial thinking, thank you.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

To add to @[email protected], this is about the virus being designed ti kill, not the vaccine, andteven cites Pfizer's director.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago

Dr McCullough is regularly posting studies for the jabs too.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 11 months ago (1 children)

As conspiracy theory bullshit goes, this is a true classic - almost up there with the Moon landing. Some Infowars-regurgitating twat was spamming about HAARP on an IRC channel I was on like 15+ years ago.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Yes I remember haarp conspiracy as early as, I think, 98. It was from a friend's mom who was into David Icky at the time. Definitely a classic older theory.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago

Because people are stupid. Stupid people believe stupid things. They don't have logic, just stupidity.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago

How in the hell do you go from “we’re using this to see what’s happening way up there in the sky” to “this causes tornadoes”?

a good starting point is The Paranoid Style in American Politics, by Richard Hofstadter

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

That's some old school before Qanon conspiracy brainworms. Made up by people who don't understand basic science and think the earth is 6000 years old.

I just hope they stick to that and don't adopt the new conspiracies like Qanon to be honest.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] -2 points 11 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/watch?v=lYX7npixFqo

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

Possibly the same as the 5G people. Due to the frequency used by HAARP, it can be received all around the world. (They published the times of planed transmissions, so if you have a shortwave radio, you can listen in)

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago

But seriously, I'm looking at the HAARP page on wikipedia and it seems to be an array for studying the ionosphere?

That's just what they want you to think!

[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago

Well the second A stands for 'active', i.e. heating the ionosphere, so it's not just observing

[–] [email protected] -2 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] -3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Thanks so much attempting to bring at least some nuance into this discussion. But the cold hard truth is that no one really wants to know, because you'll sleep a lot better if this is all just mumbojumbo.

Unfortunately though, here is a research paper straight from a US government server that basically describes how it works in theory, with the following title:

Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025

Scroll through the document. Read it. Then compare the technology to what's being claimed about HAARP and other weather manipulation tech. I know there are insane people out there who'll make the most insane claims but for every 100th nutjob there's 1 person out there who actually read up on the stuff that's available and often they're a lot more hesitant on calling it all just a hoax.

Unfortunately the truth is that people don't care. Just look at the rhetoric used in these comments. Why would scientists come forward and risk being doxxed, ratted out to their employer as a lunatic conspiracy nut, claiming that is might be possible, even if just in theory?

We had the mayor of Ankara in Turkey claiming that artificial earth quakes were used against Turkey way before 2023, though the USS Nitze docked in a Turkish port in the Black Sea just a couple of days before the February 6th earthquakes), right when Turkey was stalling for Sweden to join NATO. There's videos out there of people filming bright blue-ish lights coming from a central source the night before the earthquakes happened.

The longest time I thought this was all bullshit but the more I dug into it, the less I was able to convince myself that this is all just made up nonsense from idiots on the Internet. I'm not on the "it's all HAARP!!" train but come on, let's keep the discussion a bit more civil?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 11 months ago

Couldn't have expressed my thoughts better. I couldn't agree more!