this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2024
89 points (97.8% liked)

World News

32075 readers
1136 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Hamas is known to have redundancies in place for cases like this. What is the goal of this? It seems like this is just going to create a Martyr, and won't materially benefit Israel, just sour peace talks (unless that's their aim).

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I think the goal is to provoke a war with Iran. Netanyahu just got back from US where he presumably got the green light for it.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago

Would make sense, sadly. We will see.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

That sounds like a terrible decision to make considering 50% of Israelis live in the 30 most populated cities, cities which are all clustered together and very bombable... then again, I don't think jets from the late 70s would fare well against Israel's very modern air defenses. An ancient F-14 or a MiG-29 would probably spontaneously collapse at the sight of a Patriot SAM operated by Israel.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

What gave you the idea that Netanyahu cares about Israelis?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Iran already defeated said defences pretty easily with not even their best missiles just few months ago.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They haven't been behaving rationally for some time.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Depends on what's considered "rational." They've been successful as a genocidal settler-colonial ethnostate, but I think they are getting increasingly desparate as the international community notices their cracking mask.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

i think 'rational' is sticking to the two-state solution. 'Liberal' Zionism is fading away.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago (2 children)

If we are actually trying to solve the root cause of the conflict, then the only answer is a dissolution of the Israeli state, replacing it with a single, all-encompasing secular state with minority protections, and equal citizenship rights for Palestinians and Israelis. This won't stop the new state from being a dog of US Imperial interests, of course, but would cease the genocide.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

yea ik, I was talking from the Israeli Zionist perspective. Of course, a one state solution is the best solution.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago

Ah, gotcha. Well, for Zionists, acknowledging Palestinian Statehood ends their settler-colonial aspirations, so they won't do it. They need to get the US fully involved in a broader Middle East war.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Then their perspective is different, because Isn'treal oppose even the two state solution at every step.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sadly, there are too much religious nutjobs for this to work

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

They believe they're better and should have more rights than other people

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Why do they have these views?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You'd probably need to ask them.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Not really, their material conditions are what drives the conflict. End the aparthied regime and with it the largest factors in division crumble, over time feelings will fade.

It certainly won't be simple, easy, or immediate, but it is the only valid path to lasting peace. Everthing else keeps the core problems intact.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's in their religious texts

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Are people born with a genetic predisposition towards accepting religious texts? Why are some populations more or less dogmatically religious?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Most are taught by their parents

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Again, what causes a shift in dogmatism over time?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Access to education and societal tolerance to critical thinking?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Closer! Access to education helps, certainly. Social tolerance for critical thinking, however, stems from material conditions as well, however.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's a pretty naive take. There are plenty of rich religious fundamentalists, and plenty of poor atheists. And plenty of rich societies with very little tolerance for critical thinking

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

I don't mean wealth when I say "material conditions," I mean the whole of how society is organized and the class dynamics that exist within it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Religion is barely a factor.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

He was suing for a ceasefire. Can't have that.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago

Clearly israel is not interested with negotiation.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago