this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

Asklemmy

42520 readers
916 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Being proud of not knowing things, and having no desire to change that.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Bigotry and prejudice. Not necessarily uneducated, but certainly poorly educated.

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Coping mechanism for the poor, they can't admit they're at the bottom and so it feels good to put other people down for nonsense reasons

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago)
[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Thinking that someone without a formal education is somehow beneath you.

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

taking Ayn Rand's work seriously. five seconds of critical thought and her entire philosophy comes crashing down

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

One thing that few people seem to accept when saying that they believe in Ayn Rand's philosophy is that you are supposed to pay people what they are worth, not what you can negotiate with them.

For instance, in Atlas Shrugged, it is made explicit that Rearden pays his mill workers far above typical salaries because it is worth it to him to have the best staff working in his mills. Rearden is also the kind of person who isn't going to make racist or sexist jokes because he wants the best person regardless of sex or color.

What Objectivist is that moral?

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago)
[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That's actually the root of all social philosophies: they require decent people.

No matter which system you take, capitalism, communism, anarchism, monarchy, democracy, etc. they all would work perfectly fine, if people wouldn't be stupid, selfish and about 1% downright psychopaths. And I'm not even talking about real crimes. In your example it would be perfectly legal, to pay the workers the absolute minimum possible, but it would be a dick move.

At the end of the day, a system always has to answer the question: How do you reign in assholes? That's it. Designing a system based on Jesuses is trivial.

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not enough to reign in assholes, the system has to be designed in such a way that carriers of "dark triad" traits (i.e. the usual bad faith actors in a system) are still incentivized to contribute to or improve society without gradually dismantling it to increase their wealth/power/status. That's a hard problem to solve.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago)
[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I see this in a lot of places I do work:

Toolboxes covered in union stickers, AND Trump stickers...

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Racists benefit from worker's rights too.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago)
[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Being a conservative and accusing every progressive person of being a pedophile.

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I would say "not the grammar" since many users are not native English speakers and have learned it as a second (or third, fourth...) language. ๐Ÿ’โ€โ™‚๏ธ๐ŸŒ

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Not to mention a lot of native english speakers are garbage at the language too.

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Could of, should of, would of.

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Could've, should've, would've

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago)
[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

religion and the belief in the supernatural/paranormal. also the belief in conspiracy theories.

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

conspiracy theories i agree with, but religion? organized religion, definitely. joining a religion with a hierarchy signals that you want someone else to give you all the answers, which is very much a mark of poor education. but religious beliefs are not an automatic marker of poor education, as long as they're sincerely held, don't supersede science, and are frequently revisited and revised based on personal experience and knowledge. even basic, broad frameworks like animism or some parts of Buddhism can help you make sense of the world when science can't help you

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago)
[โ€“] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago

They think opinions are facts.