0ops

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

And their second album. And their third...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Huh, "book-learned", that's an interesting way to put it. I've been arguing for awhile that the bottleneck for LLMs might not be their reasoning ability, but the one-dimensionality of their data set.

I don't like both-sides-ing but I'm going to both-sides here: people on the internet have weird expectations for LLMs, which is strange to me because "language" is literally in the name. They "read" words, they "understand" words and their relationships to other words, and they "write" words in response. Yeah, they don't know the feeling of being burned by a frying pan, but if you were numb from birth you wouldn't either.

Not that I think the op is a good example of this, the concept of "heat" is pretty well documented.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Then you go to hell

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Dude is staring in 4 different directions

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

Why not? Half of them will sell to the highest bidder

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

🎶 Alligator-lizards in the aaaaairrr, in the aaaaaaaaaaaaaaairrr 🎶

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

You know, whenever this theory is discussed, everybody seems to assume that this simulation that we're allegedly living in is supposed to be an approximation of the parent universe, similar rules, but probably lower fidelity (basically the sims).

I think we should forget that assumption. It's human centric. Who's to say that the entity running the simulation even meant for it to be a simulation at all? Given our universe appears so much bigger than our pale blue dot from the inside, if our universe is a program running in a parent universe, I doubt that we - homo sapiens - are the point of it, or it'd be leaner, more focused. We'd be the center of the universe. But at every step of scientific discovery, we've found that that isn't true. We're just noise, sand on the beach, dust in the wind. If we live in a program, I doubt that the person running it is even aware of us specifically as a species, let alone as individuals. I doubt that they're specifically aware of any particularly galaxy, in the same way a neural network developer isn't aware of any specific weight in their model.

Granted, you could argue that that the rest observable universe is an illusion, a wilderness mural painted on the walls, designed by the simulation operator to make us think that we weren't in a zoo. But that sounds a lot like "God put those dinosaur bones there to trick us", so personally, I doubt that's it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

The dinosaurs 👀

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Little Caesars

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

I don't think there's enough screw puns to keep going, we'll have to start rotating some of them back

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It reminds me of this album

view more: ‹ prev next ›