AceBonobo

Understood. CG-NAT has been so annoying, I would love for IPv6 to completely replace v4 ASAP

I figure the mobile carrier was blocking incoming connections to my phone. This was a couple of years ago, things might have changed since then.

Thank you

I didn't mean prevent, just makes it harder by default. You can still open connections from within the NAT

Edit: I do admit to failing at accessing my IPv6 PC from my IPv6 phone

Edit2: apparently NAT is full of security bugs

You're talking about NAT traversal? We do have control over which we apps we run though?

Edit: apparently NAT is full of bugs

I still have to initiate the outgoing UDP. Are you talking about the specific case where any software running on my host can initiate it without me requesting?

Edit: apparently NAT is full of security bugs

The main benefit of a NAT is that by default it prevents all external access to the hosts inside the network. Any port you have open is not accessible unless explicitly forwarded.

This has a lot of security benefits. Regardless, everything you said is sounds true to me.

Why do you say NAT doesn't make a network more secure?

How about no?

Same, but sometimes I forget to recharge the controller

Squirchiatrist

Dave's Garage, the man who created task manager