Balinares

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 days ago (1 children)

No one can tell for certain, but it does seem like he's been huffing his own farts so hard he figured he could win this.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, what a loss. Now it will only be able to suggest glue on burgers. /s

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Thank goodness, fucking outta there is like THE special power of the Everest.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 month ago

Astounding, isn't it? That's publicly traded companies for you. The company's objective is to keep its stock up and up and up. That means shareholders must want to keep buying the stock, which in turn means that the company must demonstrate that its value will keep growing, so that by buying the stock today the shareholders will get a positive return tomorrow.

Of course, the universe is finite and no growth is forever. The end state for such companies is not bankruptcy, at least in the immediate, but, more or less, the IBM fate: a previously uber-dominant mastodon whose market capitalization is now worth maybe one tenth of its modern competitors. The fact that it's still turning a profit is only secondary: none of the big tech shops want to be the next IBM. Their executives are, after all, mostly paid in stocks.

And that's how you end up with companies that are making amounts of revenue you and I can't even comprehend flail in a panic like they're on the edge of the precipice whenever the technological landscape shifts.

It's both fascinating and remarkably dumb.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago

Interesting deep dive and very much worth a read. I'd say it probably underestimates the weight of finance-related pressures coming from the CFO's office, though.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Too real. They'll steal your heart alright, but god damn.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The "Winger" shirt really dates this.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

My friend, I don't need to go read the video game history about Daggerfall: I wrote some of it. :)

And I stand by my statement. That game was the height of storytelling that came out of Bethesda in a bunch of small but important ways, although Morrowind is not far behind, in a somewhat different fashion. And there is a definite shift in the series from the moment Ted Peterson left the team. Patently, not a shift I am personally very fond of, but to each her own.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Well, I'd argue that Daggerfall was their best game, story-wise, but Daggerfall is even older. And that's the point, isn't it? More time passed between Skyrim and Starfield than between Daggerfall and Oblivion. A lot can change in so many years, and I do believe that hoping for something new was not entirely unreasonable.

Then again, the keyword there is entirely, isn't it. I personally didn't expect very much from Starfield, and, also personally, I can't say I fully understand the amount of hype surrounding it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (7 children)

They’ve always been boring

Strongly disagreed. Pre-Oblivion their games were great. Hoping for a return to engrossing stories taking place in a rich, expansive universe was not entirely unreasonable.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago

True. It's still a good aspiration. Maybe we can get there.

view more: next ›