As far as I can tell, there is no rule to break here.

They aren't great, but they aren't totally useless either. I met my amazing fiance through one, but I had to wade through a ton of shit first.

No, it's just posturing. The emissions from AC at the Olympic Village would have zero impact on climate change. This is just green washing for public perception points.

How is it unfair? Couldn't any team do the same thing?

I posted several large wood working machines for sale there in the past year and every one was bought within 24 hours.

When did that happen? I sold several pieces of woodshop equipment there in the past year and didn't pay anything.

This driver is still beta, right? I'm not seeing release binaries on Nvidia's site. Just making sure I'm not missing anything.

You can "explain" it that way as much as you want, that doesn't make it true.

That's a completely different kind of AI. This story, and all the discussion up to this point, has been about the LLM based AIs being employed by Google search and ChatGPT.

I love how confidently wrong you are!

They have no memory actually. They are completely static. When you chat with them, every single previous prompt and response from that session is fed back through as if it were one large single prompt. They are just faking it behind a chat-like user interface. They most definitely do not learn anything after training is complete.

i like how the answers are the exact same generic unhelpful drivel you hear 20k times a month if you're depressed as well.

It makes sense though. It was trained on that drivel.