Chup

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

And first ramping up gas to then switch to renewables after is what got Germany in this mess.

It's the other way around, first it was going after renewables and now due to the coal exit ahead, gas capacities will be ramped up by a targeted 25GW over the next years.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 10 months ago (4 children)

This post is obviously not meant serious.

To the right of the damaged section we can see a thread indicator, so there is maybe around 1 mm thread on the right shoulder. Therefore the centre part was below legal limits.

Before changing tyres, the owner of that bike decided to kill off the old tyre completely by doing a burnout. We can see the flat centre piece all around on the tyre, typical for a burnout.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I would not call that a U-turn:

Instead, the government pledges to meet the 2 percent target on average over a five-year period, as already set out in the recently published National Security Strategy.

Seems more like the same direction, just on a parallel lane.

On the one hand debatable, as it doesn't come 100% in line with the wording of the NATO guideline. On the other hand a practical course to measure across 5 years, as in some years there are larger procurements required than in others and overall the 2% are still met.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

The ship can be tracked again and it's out of Ukrainian waters!

https://www.vesselfinder.com/?imo=9605243

[–] [email protected] -5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Always nice to see the discussions about throwing waste into the ocean.

  • Plastic waste: Oh no, we can't do that.
  • Chemicals: Oh no, we can't do that.
  • Old tires: Oh no, we can't do that.
  • Household waste: Oh no, we can't do that.
  • Raw sewage: Oh no, we can't do that.
  • Nuclear waste: It's save, ignore the nuclear scary folks.

Technically, throwing any waste in the ocean is save. We started doing it decades ago, as it seemed a good plan. It gets diluted below appreciable levels as the ocean is large.
Yet our current plans are to reduce and not do it, as rivers, lakes, oceans are no trash cans. We learned that over the last decades, as once allowed and accustomed, it just gets more and gets accepted as common practise. Everyone starts doing the same, as it's such an easy way out.

The problem now is the reverse on that intend – obviously due to the lack of a better or any good alternative at all. But just because all options are bad, it doesn't make this one good. No officially declared waste disposal strategy should involve throwing it in the water.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 months ago

In the 1st paragraph is a link to the previous article of the same experiment a few months ago, that has some more details mentioned:

researchers have managed to release 2.5 MJ of energy after using just 2.1 MJ to heat the fuel with lasers.

the positive energy gain reported ignores the 500MJ of energy that was put into the lasers themselves.

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/dec/12/breakthrough-in-nuclear-fusion-could-mean-near-limitless-energy

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago

The 'Fremantle Highway' is already very close to the Eemshaven port. We can follow the ships movements by tracking the tug boats, as its own transponder failed days ago during the fire.

E.g this tug boat 'Waterlines' https://www.vesselfinder.com/?imo=9881770 is in a group with other tug boats, pollution control vessels and law enforcement. They are accompanying the burning ship to its destination.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The current Solidigm 30.72TB, E1.L costs around 3350€.

There is no price for the 61TB mentioned, but we can speculate. With twice the size and maybe a 10% novelty surcharge, it would be around 7400€.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The title is total clickbait but the article is more thinking of theoretical options of events to come. E.g. how the end(s) of the war could look like.

Petr Pavel, Czech president & former general, already stated that at the end of the year, the window of opportunity might be closed for Ukraine and Ukraine should try to gain as much ground as possible before the winter. Not because of the weather, but because of elections coming in Russia, the USA and Ukraine in 2024.

https://news.sky.com/story/ukraine-has-window-of-opportunity-this-year-to-take-back-territory-from-russia-before-war-fatigue-says-czech-republics-president-12918975

Not even talking about the possible election outcomes and possible consequences for the war, already the election campaigns with their goals, promises, propaganda and unique selling points might have influence on the events and further planning. Just imagine Trump (or successor) starting a new mesh of lies and getting supported by Putin, which will get soaked up by their followers and complicate support by the USA - the largest military supporter of Ukraine so far.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I understand this is a positive news in the first week of the counter offensive, but to me - it makes me feel depressed.

It makes me look at the size of Ukraine and the occupied areas. There are thousands or probably ten thousands of occupied settlements and villages. Reporting 5 of e.g. 18.000 liberated... it is positive, it is a news, it makes me depressed looking at the scaled of what lies ahead in this war to get Russia out of Ukraine.

The thing I am hoping for and expecting, that this is not a continuous speed. In the past, we have seen Russian lines disintegrate, troops flee in civilian clothing and the front lines moved tens of kilometers within a single day.