[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Nothing says innocent like threatening with lawsuits...

It's got big corp, reputation at all costs over doing the right thing vibes. The latter is reflective and willing to improve even if things aren't bad, but could be better.

People will make their minds up based on how much they trust them. Personally, I don't.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Oof. No ability to learn. It was bad. The cover up/fob off just makes it worse.

[-] [email protected] 23 points 1 month ago

Same here. Dreadful name. Classic open source.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

Happy to chip in, but not as sole mod. I ressurected the DeGoogled community on lemmy.ml and overseeing it since then.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

The privacy is not about protecting your data from crawlers, it's about protecting your data from big tech.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago

Completely self serving though. Mobile is a personal data goldmine and Google gotta dig into that one way or another and if folks can contribute to that side with bug fixes, great.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

For anonymous payment?

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Or cash, as if you buy gift cards and they go bust, they owe you money, but you'll be well down the list and never see it again.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Matrix is the best choice we have. Embrace it or make better because we can only use what is out there.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Why does this feel lie a viral marketing campaign to get people to watch stuff on X?

"I interviewed Elon, got cancelled and he mad. Watch on X". It just doesn't add up to me.

Edit: It's not on X, apparently. It's on YouTube. So I was probably a little out on this. Very clever viral marketing still, but hopefully not to the benefit of X.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

CrypticCoffee

joined 11 months ago
MODERATOR OF