DetectiveSanity

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

this counter-offensive feels like a call for ww3

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

It was good until little while ago now I was getting ads whilst they were turned off.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I'd assume that using the service without paying (money or otherwise) for it would introduce costs to the provider hence being worse than not using it at all.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Google Services Framework if I recall correctly

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

I'm damn sure our definitions of this word are not aligned

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

That would force them to reveal it's sources (unconsented scraping) hence make them liable for any potential lawsuits. As such they would need to withdraw from revealing sources

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Depends on what you did! Say for example they're using Graphene to harass/paedophilia then they already have a copious amount of evidence on hand since they are there.

For organising peaceful protests that seems less of an issue and the other end of the chats is the weak link.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

I already like you sir.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Good luck having them delete your data cuz they didn't delete mine.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Tracking how many users you have and how many of them visit an article is hardly any breach of privacy compared to what ad companies retain.

Use an open source solution about analytics and minimise data collection if not absolutely necessary.

view more: next ›