Are you using thin film cells? That would explain this low value.
Eheran
joined 11 months ago
Nothing.
Using Connect, I will have a look! Yes, setting exists, nice!
152 is the sum of the + and -1 votes 82 % were + So 18% were - So 18% of + were canceled from the - So what we see is the remaining 64% positive, which means that 100 % are 237 votes (42 downvotes, 195 upvotes)
To me, the post has 48 upvotes (net positive).
It had 0 when I commented.
I can not see the number of up/down votes, sadly, they copied that flaw from Reddit.
Just have to love that you get downvoted for something so basic. "Nah, the current and past versions were fine!" Like what the fuck?
So what happened? How did the toilet (?) flood?
The color grading of the years is really bad. The last 20/30 years are all very low in contrast compared to each other, while 1940s and 60s are easy to tell apart, where it is least important. There are so many more colors than yellow/orange/brown, we can use them to get more information density.
He wants to do the math twice!
Is that so? Laptops have reached 10 hours of battery live under light loads years ago.
I always remembered then to be somewhat better than those numbers and this paper agrees with me (figure 1). 14 % is not premium (efficiency) for polycrystaline in 2010. Figure 1 shows 20 % for polycrystaline at 2010 and 25 % for single crystal. Thin film, on the other hand, is down there at maybe 15 %.