[-] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago
[-] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Thanks, I'll see what can I find second hand but yes, if it's significantly easier to transfer I will just get a full set.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

Shit, meant to say 'Now that's close'. Stupid typo.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

That's 400-600 Euro. Bit much to just try it out. Maybe I could find something second hand... What's the benefits compared with starting with mobile drum pad?

[-] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

If Guitar hero set worked for you than for example this:

https://www.thomann.de/es/millenium_md_90_mobile_drum.htm

should also be fine, right? It even has two pedals. Would that be a reasonable starting point what would later let me move to full drums?

[-] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

They are becoming more essential by the day.

Exactly, they are becoming essential now. They are still not essential and definitely were not essential 14 years ago. That's all I'm saying. Expecting that everyone will invest a lot of effort to support a project that does not deliver any value to vast majority of users is silly. 14 years later the need is slowly growing so the support is materializing. That should be the approach from the beginning: build something people need.

21
submitted 9 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

I'm thinking about learning to play drums for some time now and I have a question. If I'm a complete beginner should I still get a full drum set? I know you can buy a cheap electric set for like $300 but can I start with something smaller and simpler? Are there some kind of electric pads that would work for taking first steps and that would later let me progress to full drum set? It's not that I don't have space, I'm just not sure I will stick with it and I don't want to be stack a big set I don't use later. Or full set is actually the best way to start?

[-] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

'Giving them platform'? What is that supposed to mean? It's not like they gaining anything from my CPU cycles. No one knows what software I'm running on my computer.

I'm not depending on any software as long as there are alternatives. And no, the point is not to disagree with large companies. Big corporations make contributions to Linux kernel all the time. As long as it's truly FOSS and they don't control it it's not an issue. If the company controls it it's not really FOSS (like Chrome or Android).

Also, not using their code is not the same as telling everyone else they should not use it. You can use whatever you like. Complaining online that some community was not nice to you is IMHO silly.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Again, not essential to vast majority of Linux users.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

Why would a recruiter know about all the technologies? He knows what technology is required for a given position and doesn't care about all the other stuff in your profile.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

Where I live police monitors those things. They will even check pawn shop inventory for jewellery reported as stolen and you have to show an ID to pawn anything. You would have to sell it to some random guys on the street which would be risky.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

None of those features are essential for average user. None of them are even 'nice to haves' for like 90% of users.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago

I don't think stealing would be the hard part. Selling the goods would be. To steal large sum I guess I will drive a stolen car through a jewellery store's window. I believe this had fairly high success rate with Romanian gangs doing this many times in France and getting away with it. To steel a car I would look for someone leaving it running while and getting out to for a moment. I think I would be able to find one in a couple of weeks. Than smash the widow, grab what I can and run. Risky but if I'm dying anyway it would be worth trying. Turning it into cash would be very difficult though.

97
submitted 9 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

How close was it?

239
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Haven't seen any posts about this and it's a pretty big thing. From DMA website:

Examples of the “do’s”: gatekeepers will for example have to:

  • allow third parties to inter-operate with the gatekeeper’s own services in certain specific situations;
  • provide companies advertising on their platform with the tools and information necessary for advertisers and publishers to carry out their own independent verification of their advertisements hosted by the gatekeeper;
  • allow their business users to promote their offer and conclude contracts with their customers outside the gatekeeper’s platform.

Example of the “don'ts”: gatekeepers will for example no longer:

  • treat services and products offered by the gatekeeper itself more favourably in ranking than similar services or products offered by third parties on the gatekeeper's platform;
  • prevent users from un-installing any pre-installed software or app if they wish so;
  • track end users outside of the gatekeepers' core platform service for the purpose of targeted advertising, without effective consent having been granted.

We'll see how this plays out but this is first move in a very long time that could open up platform like WhatsApp to 3rd party clients and force Google and Apple to open their mobile OSes to other apps. Maybe we'll see stock Android without play services? One can dream...

P.S. https://digital-markets-act-cases.ec.europa.eu - page about the legislation

view more: next ›

ExLisper

joined 10 months ago