I would hope so, but Asus has been doing things like this for at least 10+ years which makes me doubtful that anything will change soon.
Trying to refund through Asus will result in them dragging their feet, being as unhelpful as possible, or claiming you damaged the product.
Qubes is linux isn't it?
After using Kagi a few months I've switched to Brave, and been pretty happy with it. It can be low on image results, but for regular web results I haven't needed anything else.
Kagi was pretty good, but it didn't really seem good enough compared to Brave search to justify $10 a month.
Problem is that regular Google results are also getting worse. Google has to change something about search, and they're most worried about chatgpt being a better alternative to Google search.
Brave does have an option to use anonymous Google results as a fallback if their index doesn't return enough results, but it will ask you before it does it.
I'd be happy to help out, but I'm on the Sopuli instance. I believe lemmy fixed the issues where you couldn't moderate a community unless you were on the same instance, but I haven't actually tried yet. I currently moderate [email protected]
If you find good mods from lemmy.ml feel free to pick them over me, I just wanted to offer my help.
Ok, so this is a Lemmy post that links a r/ailess post that links a r/privacy post that finally links this Ars Technica article.
Why not just link the Ars Technica article to begin with? I don't think there's any good reason to link all these separate chained discussions.
Where did you get that emoji?
It restoring deleted photos onto wiped devices that have been resold is a privacy nightmare.
I'm torn between my dislike of the CCP, and really wanting an EV for $12k.
Idk, with real people the determination on if someone is underage is based on their age and not their physical appearance. There are people who look unnaturally young that could legally do porn, and underage people who look much older but aren't allowed. It's not about their appearance, but how old they are.
With drawn or AI-generated CSAM, how would you draw that line of what's fine and what's a major crime with lifelong repercussions? There's not an actual age to use, the images aren't real, so how do you determine the legal age? Do you do a physical developmental point scale and pick a value that's developed enough? Do you have a committee where they just say "yeah, looks kinda young to me" and convict someone for child pornography?
To be clear I'm not trying to defend these people, but it seems like trying to determine what counts legal/non-legal for fake images seems like a legal nightmare. I'm sure there are cases where this would be more clear cut (if they ai generate with a specific age, trying to do deep fakes of a specific person, etc), but a lot of it seems really murky when you try to imagine how to actually prosecute over it.