Glemek

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

You are right! There isn't any indication in the app itself that I could find though; but when I searched it up on google play it says I have classic installed, not standard.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Pretty sure I am using the free version, or if I paid it was a one time thing and long ago but it will walk you thru at least some problems. Example:

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Sausage, eggs, home fries, english muffin, milk, oj

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

Nonono, we had this discussion about the snake yesterday: the tree kills you by dropping a limb on you long before it eats you.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

While the food itself looks a little plain for my tastes, the idea is really cute, and I'm willing to hold a 7 year old's birthday dinner to a different standard than my own cooking. So I'd call this in good taste, and good execution.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't want to argue

Is this true? Doesn't seem true.

I gave you a reasonable explaination as to why a slight difference in pan volume wasn't a particularly meaningful criticism of the less voluminous pan, particularly when it has the other characteristic you want: more edges per volume of brownies.

This is maybe as plainly as I can say it, you'll be able to fit your standard "pan of brownies" recipe in both pans, without folding space, or having to tune your recipe down by some awkward amount. If your recipe can't fit in one, you probably shouldn't go single in the other even if you physically can, and are in for multiple pans or cycles anyway.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Originally bringing total pan volume into it confused me, a baking pan has an upper limit to how much brownie you can bake per cycle in it, but by the time you are anywhere near that limit you are probably already better off using a second pan.

The example brownies from the picture are nowhere near that limit, so if there was a moderate but significant decrease in the volume of the pan in the change to the squares It doesn't seem like it should be a problem even on a per cycle basis. Even so, the cost of doing an additional cycle of baking is not that high anyways.

The main factor in how much volume of brownie you make will be the amount of brownie batter you make. Non-euclidean space isn't required to bake an additional 25% or so of brownies by volume in that pan, and so your reply seemed snide, and I responded kurtly.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (9 children)

They're reusable though

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (13 children)

Okay, but the volume depends on the batter, not the pan.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Damn Hawaii, you've been eating well

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Yeah, it somewhere in the edit it flipped, and I didn't care to change it back

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

But dymaxion is my favorite

 
view more: next ›