Well for one, I immediately deleted my comment because I think I misread the post title, so didn't want to accuse OP. How can everyone see it still to vote and reply?
Two: it's talking about the trolley problem and letting one die. Seems transphobic to let the girl die because she revealed she had a dick (if that is indeed the reason). That implication is kind of there. At the same time it could simply be that both would be great options, which I think is what OP intended and is why I deleted my comment.
Three: it's a shitpost and it probably doesn't need such analysis.
The quality is so low thst as soon as she is in motion she looks like a slenderman.
You could put them all in hotels for less than that, with the secondary effect of stimulating local businesses. Isn't that what conservatives are all about? Or is it only when they own said businesses?
Maybe be thought about leaving the cul de sac for one loop. I imagine the madness would take hold at some point during this.
That's true, but that only amounted to 9 meals out of 90 over the month. It wasn't really the burning issue, just a knee jerk reaction to the title of the film.
His method wasn't specifically about eating super-size, it was just that he ate nothing but McDonald's for a month (and probably a lot of booze according to various sources).
Stop, he's already dead.
I'm trying to read this title but I think I'm having a stroke.
I don't think that's allowed. Even if it is her birthday.
That's not very useful if there are no more elections.