Moral objectivism is pretty much the argument that inevitably always ends with an authoritarian regime to "eliminate" the "unethical" people from society. Germany first, and all that.
Imotali
joined 1 year ago
See but you're assuming that we agree to your axiomatic premise that there is no moral difference between the two.
We reject your premise. Prove there's no difference.
More than half of America lives paycheck to paycheck. Vegan options are more expensive. Until you fix the economic crisis and solve poverty you really can't enforce veganism.
This isn't even getting into the fact that vegan options are literally nonexistent in many places.
Oh but you don't care about that because you only care about veganism because it allows you to feel morally superior to others.
"Carnism" that's the difference between vegans and non-vegans.
Only vegans view their diet as a lifestyle and shit on everyone else who isn't vegan. We're not "carnists" we don't give a fuck really except that we hate vegans. Why? Because you lot are the pushiest, most openly judgemental, arrogant pieces of shit to walk the earth.
"have a little priest."
They're comment is wrong. But non-marxian communism exists. For example council communism.
But a Tankie is basically a Leninist/Stalinist/Maoist communist who dick rides authoritarianism.