Nefyedardu

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

Ok, not a typo. Other than the title of these patch notes, is it referred to as "Steam Deck OS" anywhere else? On Preview branch the distro still says "SteamOS Holo".

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

The fact is that they are rebranding it to Steam Deck OS.

As far as I know they've said nothing about that. It's reasonable to say that the title is a typo for a couple reasons.

  1. They've stated they want SteamOS on third-party devices before
  2. There's also the rumored VR headset running SteamOS as well

Two use cases for the OS that have nothing to do with Steam Deck, so "Steam Deck OS" makes no sense as a name. I personally think they are waiting for Plasma 6+HDR support+VR support before they ship a desktop version, it's important to have feature-parity with Windows out the gate for good word-of-mouth.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago (13 children)

"SteamOS" is mentioned twice in the actual patch notes

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

going into a menu on windows to change some settings once is a bridge too fucking far

"Once". Yeah right.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

So the CCP is full of idiots that are willing to weaken their international relations for a bunch of useless pieces of rock? Is that what you are saying?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Holy fucking cringe, if I was the CCP propaganda office I would want my money back.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

"Patchwork" sounds like a good way to describe Windows as well. Or at least it was when I was a Windows 10 sysadmin and there were two different settings menus to do everything.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I got it the day it came out so it was the wild west. I think to get it to work on Arch I figured out you needed to compile the new llvm or something, and I just gave up at that point. Fedora Silverblue on the rawhide branch had everything for it, and as soon as 37 was caught up I just re-based on that branch and have been good ever since. Ubuntu did have some other issue I don't remember, not a new enough kernel maybe.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I love System 76 but I hate modified GNOME anything. That's why I always use Fedora. When Cosmic DE comes out I'll give it a shot.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

The third party thing is outdated, you can enable it at install and have access to flathub and fusion repo. So installing Steam or Nvidia drivers is dead simple now. I would still say it's not great for new users because it's ultra minimal.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (9 children)

I realized Arch was overrated when I got a brand new 7900 XT and it didn't work on Arch at all because their LLVM was a version behind. It was up-to-date on Fedora and even Ubuntu, but not Arch. Then there was the whole broken grub thing. Bleeding edge and unstable I get, but you can't be unstable and also behind. You can run Arch in any distro with distrobox, I don't see why you wouldn't just do that.

Ubuntu has ads in the terminal when you update. Runs a highly modified GNOME that doesn't play well with some extensions. Snaps by default (although maybe not that bad now that they seem to launch a bit quicker). Unfortunately so many things only have Ubuntu support if they have Linux support at all, it's such a shame.

view more: next ›