No_Eponym

My comrad in crisis, we can't even keep this planet habitable, or build/select builders for reliable space vehicles after dropping billions of dollars on development and deployment. What makes you think we can even come close to the level of cooperation and competence needed to establish and maintain human habitation on such a hostile world?

Let's see if we can't ensure continued habitation on Earth first. Then, maybe, we might have a chance on some other sphere?

Or lactation fetishist.

But sometimes they do for some people because taste is subjective and based on visual cues and expectation?

In the end, the real forbidden fruit was fossil fuels.

I always feel like these induced demand arguments are suggesting that adding more lanes means the same number of people are just choosing to do more driving. Maybe, as you add more lanes you create the infrastructure for a city to grow, and it adds more people which then fill up the new lanes. People aren't just going out and buying a new car or rolling an existing car out of the driveway that they were previously not using because a new lane is built. These are net new drivers, who would not be in that city if the infrastructure for them hadn't been built.

Isn't this kind of a garbage comparison? Your chance of dying by childbirth is zero if you choose not to have kids, or if you biologically can't have kids. Same with almost everything on this list, other than the only other medical intervention of GA (which you may not have a choice to avoid if you need it for a medically necessary procedure). Wouldn't it be better to compare it to the risk dying of COVID? Or the risk of dying from other common vaccines?

I think this is the wrong community for this type of comment ...

< We will provide >

< Countermeasures/Strategy >

< Accept/ingest them >

Plan bomb?