I think it's more to do with that if the collective workers vote to become a union or not, and succeeds in that vote, then the owner/company must recognize them as the union and engage in negotiations as such.
If the vote of the workers fails to choose to unionize...well usually that means the people who tried to organize it get fired because there's no union
Won the vote to organize a union, something that has to be done in the U.S.
I agree in that it doesn't need to be required, but I think you're leaving money on the table and intentionally limiting who can experience the art you're trying to share with the world.
You don't HAVE to include more than the basic colorblind option and maybe some extra visual cues, but games that go farther and allow more people to enjoy their product are better products for it.
Souls games are great. I don't want to 'get gud' so I haven't bought one ever, and with no difficulty drop I probably never will. I don't have time for that. It's not a bad game because they don't have features to make it more accessible to me, but it COULD be a better game if they did.
Actual traffic laws? This thing is safe as can be. It's got just the right angles that if it hits a pedestrian they'll bounce right into one of the designated Kill Corners, making their end painless. That sounds like regulation working to me
I mean, it is annoying. But it's security. Don't want people having access to your device, remove all possibility someone CAN.
But it is annoying, we shouldn't HAVE to do this. Privacy should be baked right into our daily lives and not clawed out with tired hands every chance we get.
The article cites it as 11 to 12, and another at 15 to 16. What country do you live in that has 12 year old kindergarteners?
I know not of who you speak, but have you considered that it's mosquitoes making accounts to defend themselves?
But how does that make any sense in regards to trans issues?
Like, I'd get if maybe some laws weren't being brought to vote because it doesn't fit the agenda for the day, but do you really think all 3 branches of our government are so embroiled in lgbtq+ issues that they aren't making other laws? How does what politicians are discussing on social media or on television affect whether a regulatory agency is going to open their eyes and prosecute when things are put on their desk? Is the SEC (not the government, but the governments enforcers) discussing trans medicine this whole time instead of intentionally looking away from white collar theft?
Little Debbie was grinning something awful though.
You're not wrong. My nan died the other day, fucking guy didn't even take of his cap as they carried her through the kitchen to the backdoor. The box of Zatteran's at least bowed its head.
This person's clearly never gotten their dick stuck in an unsupervised bolognese, and it shows.
No, and I do not agree with the above poster, but we're aided in that most of our forms are in both English and Spanish, the two most common native tongues of people who live here.