my sweet baby boyo please stop trying to frame this as if you're the normal one just to protect your ego

think of somebody in your life that you wouldn't want to have an extended conversation with

there's obviously somebody, because everybody has somebody

now imagine if a third party advised that somebody to deliberately try to have a painfully extended conversation with you

would you be happy with that third party?

please answer the questions

Maybe you should have the decency to contemplate why anyone claiming to be female online must be automatically right. That’s pretty sexist to tie truth to gender. You know literally nothing about me, so don’t draw any conclusions.

what the fuck are you talking about

you said a dumb thing online and people are calling you out on it

there's nothing more to it than that

would you want to have an extended conversation with some weird incel?

obviously not

so would you want somebody pointing you out to that incel as a great person to have an extended conversation with?

again, obviously not

real men do whatever they like and don’t let others dictate what they can or can’t

this might not be a good message to deliver to a member of a group so prolific in the mass-shooting community that they have a wikipedia article dedicated to that fact

😭

so you just don't understand the implications of the original message you posted?

otherwise please reply with a justification of how:

• Nazi propaganda that sought to justify the holocaust was equivalent to allied propaganda
• Nazi censorship of truth that aimed to hide their death camps from the world was equivalent to allied censorship of truth
• The Nazi's wicked despot who was quite literally Hitler was equivalent to any leading figure on the allied side
• etc.

you made an incredibly silly argument, but the even sillier thing to do right now is to stand by it

just ask a question before putting your dumbfuck words in someone else’s mouth

you not understanding the implications of your own argument isn't my problem, friend

apologist

"both sides were as bad as each other" is very obviously a stance in defence of the nazis, so i don't know what you think "apologist" means

We'd be having the exact same conversation about how the Japanese would've never surrendered had we not the proof otherwise.

the Nazis being Nazis would’ve justified vaporizing every civilian man, woman, and child in a city or two

• The bomb didn't "vaporize every man woman and child".
• 175 000 Volksturm (civilians pressed into service by their government, including women and children) died fighting the Allied advance into Germany. Dropping the bomb to end the war early would have prevented these deaths.
• This isn't to mention the number of civilians who died as a result of being too close to the fighting. 125 000 civilians died in the Battle of Berlin alone.
• Also consider the number of soldiers who died on both sides which wouldn't have happened had the war been ended early. The US produced so many Purple Heart medals (given to those who are killed or wounded while serving) in preparation for their invasion of Japan that they're still using them today.

So yes dropping the bomb to end the war in Europe early would have been justified. Now please stop being a literal nazi apologist.

are you really both-sidesing the literal nazis?