Makes sense, but at least this would generally be out of a normal users usage case (multi-file documents), and so the power user could probably just open flatseal.

For things like bookmarks it'd work fine, and by extension make the sandbox more secure

I'm not 100% confident but I thought you could use portals to access individual files outside of the sandbox

I guess thats a good example, when have I claimed to have a solution?

Im just saying they have a monopoly, but if I could scale up to YouTube size economically, I'd probably be doing it instead of arguing about it online

Learn Godot game engine, free and fun to just mess around with a physics engine too your PC melts

Cause a lot of people care more about feeling comfortable than feeling statistically probable.

Same as Walmart killing off every ma and pa shop is their fault, they lowbid the competition solely because they're able to with their monopolization, solution being actual competition in the industry.

Can't help but feel your goal posts are sentient with how much they're moving.

The cost of server upkeep alone

Video content? YouTube's made it all but impossible to compete with their free offerings, for the cost of server upkeep alone

Sounds like the monopolized industry isn't right for the users

Funny enough this 'slop' is compliance, but hey you seem to think you're mega dev supreme so I'm sure you already knew that

Adblockers existed so google took it out on all of Firefox, the collateral being a win-win to their monopoly

Probably along the lines of 'its bloated and too many dependencies'.

Though most flatpaks use a common base, any modifications on top of that sometimes need to be stored modified (now having 2 or more copies of one dependency)

To anyone that's not a Linux nerd the app looks about the same size as on all other OS's, but on Linux it makes it a lot larger than just bare bones installing it via package manager